Why did you choose a job in this profession?

Studying Physics, I realised I loved the ideas but wasn’t drawn to life in a lab. I wanted a career that kept me close to the science but in a setting that emphasised communication and analysis over laboratory work. Patent work struck exactly that balance because I get to dig into how things work, then put my energy into thinking carefully and writing well about them.

What attracted you to your role?

Since secondary school, I’ve enjoyed subjects that involve applying complex information, particularly physics and history. Patent law practice is unique in that it combines both scientific and literary skills, as the role demands an in-depth understanding of technical subject matter and the ability to articulate that clearly in writing. For me, it sits right where my interests meet.

How did it tie in with your overall career plans?

I wanted a career that offered clear progression and intellectual growth. The patent attorney qualification process, involving a structured series of exams over several years, was especially appealing to me, as it allowed me to continue learning and development beyond university. The progression path is well-defined, and passing each exam is a tangible marker of growth in the profession.

How did you get your job at HG?

I applied through the IP Careers website, and the process ran across two interviews. The first centred on a technical written test based on an invention; the second included questions about the profession and patent law.

What was the application process like – any advice?

I really enjoyed it – it felt stimulating rather than a slog. I particularly enjoyed the written test component, so I would advise prospective applicants to develop a portfolio of technical writing to showcase both clarity and accuracy in communicating scientific ideas.

What are your main duties?

Day to day, I draft patent applications, respond to examination reports, and prepare infringement analysis.

What skills are useful in this profession?

Attention to detail is everything, particularly when drafting patent claims because even a small punctuation error can impact the scope of protection. Analytical thinking matters just as much, whether you’re answering an examiner’s objections or distinguishing an invention from prior art. There’s a creative side too, in spotting and articulating all the different embodiments an invention might take. And finally, good time management is non-negotiable: the work is deadline-driven and you’re usually juggling several things at once.

What would you like to achieve in the future?

My goal is to become fully qualified as a UK and European patent attorney. Beyond the qualifications, I’m interested in expanding into the litigation side of intellectual property, particularly working on infringement and validity disputes.

Do you have any advice for anyone wanting to enter the profession?

Start by developing your writing skills, particularly in a scientific context. Contributing to student journals or scientific magazines is excellent preparation and provides valuable experience in communicating complex ideas clearly.